Salvatore Nuara: Among Six Names Exposed in the Epstein Files

Salvatore Nuara appears among six names that U.S. Representative Ro Khanna read on the House floor after reviewing less‑redacted Epstein records at the Department of Justice, a move that reignited debate over what should remain public and what should stay redacted.

Table of Contents

What Changed and Why It Matters

On February 10, 2026, Rep. Khanna listed six previously redacted men tied to the Epstein files during floor remarks and in posts on social media, citing an in‑person review at DOJ with Rep. Thomas Massie. The six are Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonic Leonov, Nicola Caputo, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem and Leslie Wexner.

Lawmakers say the names had been masked despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which directed broad disclosure. DOJ has published a massive online library and continues to update it, while acknowledging the need to protect victim identities and sensitive material.

Key Points at a Glance

Khanna and Massie say they identified six names within two hours at DOJ and argued the men’s identities should not have been redacted.
DOJ’s public library now hosts millions of pages of records and states that redactions focus on victims and sensitive information.
News coverage stresses crucial caveats. Being named in the files does not by itself indicate criminal wrongdoing.

What We Know About Salvatore Nuara

Public reporting remains thin. Outlets summarizing the congressional disclosures identify Nuara as one of the six names unmasked by Khanna. They add little verified background beyond his appearance within the materials and the broader list read in Congress.

Some pieces speculate or recap unverified fragments from older chatter. Responsible coverage treats those details cautiously and focuses on what the congressional record confirms. That record is simple. Nuara’s name is in a list that lawmakers say should not have been redacted in the first place. Nothing in these disclosures, standing alone, alleges a crime by Nuara.

The Transparency Fight Behind the Scenes

Members of Congress pushed for unmasking after DOJ released a trove of materials under the Transparency Act. The department says it will continue to correct redaction errors and emphasize privacy obligations to survivors. The library warns that some content remains sensitive and that inadvertent personal data may still surface due to the scale of the release.

Independent and mainstream outlets have tracked the dispute. Reports describe DOJ redactions that lawmakers challenged, including a list in which most non‑victim names were initially hidden. Several stories also note that officials later acknowledged mistakes and reopened redaction decisions.

What Does and Does Not Mean

It is tempting to draw conclusions when a name appears in high‑profile files. That is a mistake. Coverage across outlets underscores the line between mention and misconduct. Only a court can determine guilt, and no charges linked solely to these mentions have been announced for the six men Khanna named.

If you want to examine source material directly, DOJ’s library provides a central hub for disclosures tied to the Act, along with notes on search limitations and redaction practices.

Why The Story Remains Important

It tests how far transparency should go in cases involving powerful networks and vulnerable survivors.
It highlights how congressional oversight can change what the public learns and when.
It reminds readers to separate verified facts from speculation when reputations are at stake.